Showing posts with label ACT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACT. Show all posts

Saturday, June 22, 2019

How the ACT Has Changed

Students frequently ask how much the ACT has changed in recent years and whether the older ACTs that they find online provide good practice for the current exam.

The short answers are "not that much" and "yes they do." The ACT has made some minor tweaks over the last few years, but the types of questions and passages that appear on the older exams appear on the current exams.

The big change on the Reading Test is that every ACT since 2015 has included a dual passage, i.e., a passage made up of two shorter passages offering different perspectives on a particular topic. Dual passages made occasional appearances prior to then, but there aren't many of them on older tests.

At about the same time, the Science Test reduced the number of passages from seven to six. The types of questions and passages did not change.

The mix of questions on the Math Test has gotten harder in the last few years. On the April 2019 ACT, a student could miss thirteen questions on the Math Test and still get a 30. In 2009, the same number of correct answers would only have netted a 27. However, the difficulty of the individual questions hasn't changed much. The hardest questions today aren't much different from the hardest questions ten years ago. It's the ratio of hard questions to easy questions that has changed.

Another thing the ACT has done over the last few years is to include more Statistics & Probability questions on each test. Since 2016, each exam has contained six such questions. Again, however, these questions aren't any more difficult than the ones that the ACT asked before 2016--there are simply more per test.

The section that has changed the least is the English Test. In 2008, the English Test stopped offering "OMIT the underlined portion" as an answer choice. Now, it says "DELETE the underlined portion" instead.

I would certainly recommend doing the most recent tests first, but the older tests are still excellent practice.


Monday, November 26, 2018

However v. Nevertheless

However and nevertheless are often synonymous, but not always. “However” can always be used in place of “nevertheless,” but “nevertheless” cannot always replace “however.”




Both words draw a contrast, but “however” merely points out the contrast; “nevertheless,” conveys the added idea that the contrast is surprising. “Nevertheless” means “despite that.”


1a) The full-sized van carries more passengers than the mini-van. 
1b) However, the mini-van gets better gas mileage. 

2a) The full-sized van carries more passengers than the mini-van. 
2b) Nevertheless, the full-sized van gets better mileage.

Both pairs of sentences draw contrasts between the full-sized van and the minivan, but the first contrast is expected. There is nothing surprising about the smaller vehicle getting better mileage than a bigger one. Only "however" is proper here. “Nevertheless” would not make sense.

In the the second pair of sentences, the contrast is surprising. Despite the fact that the full-sized van is bigger than the minivan--i.e., it holds more people--it also gets better mileage.  Either “however” or “nevertheless” would be proper here.


I don’t recall the ACT ever requiring the student to choose between “however” and “nevertheless,” but the SAT did so on Practice Test 2.

It has long been known that the sea otters living along the West Coast of North America help keep kelp forests in their habitat healthy and vital. They do this by feeding on sea urchins and other herbivorous invertebrates that graze voraciously on kelp. With sea otters to keep the population of sea urchins in check, kelp forests can flourish. In fact, even two years or less of sea otter presence can reduce the sea urchin threat in a coastal area Without sea otters present, nevertheless, kelp forests run the danger of becoming barren stretches of coastal wasteland known as urchin barrens.
25                                                                                                                                                
A) NO CHANGE
B) however,
C) hence,
D) likewise,

Here there is nothing surprising about what happens when there are no sea otters, so "nevertheless" is inappropriate.

Of course, the College Board's explanation is not particularly helpful:
Choice B is the best answer because the conjunctive adverb "however” accurately communicates the contrast between an environment shaped by the presence of sea otters, described in the preceding sentence, and an environment shaped by the absence of sea otters, described in this sentence.
Choices A, C, and D are incorrect because each presents a conjunctive adverb that does not accurately depict the relationship between the preceding sentence and the sentence with the underlined word.
In other words, "nevertheless" is wrong because it's not right.

Friday, October 26, 2018

Answering Science Questions without Science

Sometimes you can answer Science questions based purely on the units in the answers.  In the following question, knowing what S is or what Table 2 says is unnecessary.
34. Lightning strikes can occur when air between the ground and the base of a storm cloud is exposed to an electric field stronger than S for air. Suppose a certain storm cloud's based is 300m above the ground the ground. Based on Table 2, approximately what minimum voltage would be present between the storm cloud's base and the ground immediately before a bolt of lightning from this storm cloud strikes the ground? 

F.  300,000 mm x 3.13 kV/mm 
G. 300.000 m x 3.13 kV/mm
H.    300 mm    
     3.13 kV/mm
J.       300 m     
    3.13 kV/mm

December 2015 (72E)
The question asks for "minimum voltage." Therefore, the unit of the answer will be have to be some sort of voltage, and the only unit of voltage is kV.. Get rid of H and J because kV is in the denominator, so the unit in those will be 1/kV. Get rid of G because it has different length units in the  numerator (meters - m) and the denominator (millimeters -mm), and they won't cancel out. The only answer in which the length units will cancel, leaving a voltage unit, is F.

The Perfect Tense on the ACT



A. John took the ACT.
B. John has taken the ACT.


Choosing between between the present perfect tense (“has taken”) and the past tense (“took”) isn't always easy. Deciding on the past perfect tense (“had taken”) isn't any easier. According to Grammerly, “The present perfect tense refers to an action or state that either occurred at an indefinite time in the past (e.g., we have talked before) or began in the past and continued to the present time (e.g., he has grown impatient over the last hour).” That doesn't really clear things up though.


The fact of the matter is that there is often little basis to prefer one over the other. In the example above, either choice satisfactorily answers the question, “Did John take the ACT.” The good news is that the ACT rarely presents a straight choice between the perfect tense and the past tense—perhaps because there are so many cases when either one would do the trick. Most of the time when both the perfect tense and the past tense among the choices, there is some other issue that determines the correct choice.

The men combined their skills, organized a group of investors, and remains in business for more than fifty years.
5. A. NO CHANGE
    B. has remained
    C. have remain
    D. remained

April 2015 (73G)

If the choice were between “have remained” and “remained,” it might be tough call. but happily, the student is not required to make that decision. A is incorrect both because “remains” is singular while the subject of the sentence, “men,” is plural and because “remains” is present tense while the other verbs in the sentence, “combined” and “organized,” are past tense. B is incorrect because “has” is singular. C is incorrect because the perfect tense requires the past participle, “remained.” Thus D Is correct. Whenever, the perfect tenses and the past tenses are among the answer choices to an English question on the ACT, the first thing to do is to look for something else going on. The fact that there is so little difference between the past tense and the perfect tense can even help you to the correct answer when other rules are being tested.


It was exhausting to spend every day in the hot summer temperatures while pretending to be a person whom had lived in a different country and century.

25. A. NO CHANGE 
      B. who were to live 
      C. whom lived 
      D. who lived 
April 2015 (73G)

If you know your “who” or “whom” rules, you know that the answer is D. If you aren't sure about those rules, consider how little difference there often is between “lived” and “had lived.” Since the ACT rarely requires you to make that choice, it is likely that both A and C are wrong.

On those occasions when there is a direct choice between perfect tense and past tense, going for consistency will usually produce the correct response.

Worse yet, there's no going back; the old hot water pipes have been ripped out, and a jagged four-foot hole in the roof has turned into an unplanned and precarious skylight. 

25. A. NO CHANGE 
      B. was turning
      C. turned
      D. would have turned

May 2002 (55C)
The first thing to check when verb tenses are in play is the surrounding verbs. Here we have another verb in the sentence in the past perfect tense ("have been"), so go with A to be consistent.

There are some cases where there is a clear difference in meaning between the perfect tense and the past tense.

A. After John's wife left him, he went crazy. 
B. Since John's wife left him, he has gone crazy. 

A describes an event that occurred in the past followed by another event that occurred in the past. It says nothing about John's current state of mind. B describes an event that occurred in the past followed by a condition that continues to the present. If the ACT requires a choice between the perfect tense and the past tense, it is likely to be this type of situation. 
While some sculptors suggest the magnitude of an event by presenting larger-than-life figures, Lin relies on more understated methods to suggest matters of great significance. Since the unveiling of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, Lin has applied this approach in different parts of the country and to different areas of United States history. 
51. A. NO CHANGE 
      B. will apply 
      C. applied 
      D. applying  

April 2005 (60E)

Here is an event that occurred in the past, the unveiling, followed by an ongoing practice by the sculptor. The correct answer is A. When faced by the perfect tense on the ACT, the student should first look for what else is changing in the answer choices. There will usually be other issues that decide the answer. On occasion, however, the ACT does test the perfect tense directly.\